Both Myanmar and the US should change

P.L.E Priatna, Jakarta | Fri, 12/02/2011 9:26 AM A | A | A | - Klipping the Jakarta Post

Hillary Clinton, the US Secretary of State, is making a historical visit to Myanmar on Dec. 1-2, 2011. Exactly 50 years after John Foster Dulles went to Burma and just after ASEAN leaders let Myanmar chair ASEAN in 2014, Clinton’s visit should not only help Myanmar make political progress but also create momentum to change the US policy toward Myanmar.

“Every ASEAN member state supports Myanmar’s chairmanship [bid]. But please don’t misunderstand this support to mean that development in Myanmar’s [democracy] is now 100 percent perfect because it isn’t. The process is still ongoing,” Indonesian Foreign Minister Marty Natalegawa said after the ASEAN Ministerial Meeting in Nusa Dua, Bali, last week (The Jakarta Post, 16/11). This message is important not only for Myanmar, but also the US government.

US President Barack Obama and all leaders gathering in Bali for the East Asia Summit expressed in their EAS chairman’s statement strong support for the current progress in Myanmar.

The leaders welcomed the significant positive development in Myanmar throughout 2011 and underscored the importance of maintaining strong momentum and continued progress.

Clinton’s visit, therefore, should mark strong US-ASEAN and US-Myanmar relations. In the past few months there have been a flurry of visits of US officials to Myanmar, such as US Deputy Assistant Secretary of State Joseph Yun (May 2011), US Senator John McCain (June 2011), US Special Envoy Derek Mitchell (September, October and November 2011) and Michael H. Posner, assistant secretary, Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights and Labor (November 2011).

However, US Congress insisted in September 2011 on extending trade sanctions against Myanmar by one more year in view of the Myanmar government’s continued human rights violations and suppression of political opposition.

This unfair decision will potentially bottleneck efforts to accelerate the new spirit of the US-ASEAN relations.

On Nov. 18, 2011 the National League for Democracy (NLD), the main opposition group, led by Aung San Suu Kyi, decided to register and rejoin the political process.

Not only should Myanmar change, it is fair to say that it is timely for the US also to shift its policy on Myanmar.

The US should lift all kinds of sanctions and economic embargo slapped on the Southeast Asian nation. ASEAN ministers last January in Lombok asked for the withdrawal of sanctions against Myanmar because the isolationist approach was proved to bring no changes to the country. Instead it aggravated the suffering of people there at grassroots levels.

The US should not play out its own agenda in Myanmar simply to satisfy members of Congress. Again this only shows to the world the US’ inconsistency, vested-interests and miscalculations.

“Relations between our two governments will be eased greatly if we see significant progress in these areas [the release of political prisoners, participation by opposition parties in the political life and on conflicts in ethnic areas]… We look forward to being able to play a more active and supportive role in the Burmese people’s aspirations for human rights and democracy … We will need to see some much more concrete steps in order to lift the sanctions,” said Posner, the assistant secretary of the Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights and Labor, in Yangoon on Nov. 5.

Myanmar has proved its domestic consolidation and gradual political changes. But why doesn’t the US want to lift its sanctions on Myanmar?

The new US engagement policy in the Southeast Asia region must calculate a policy of fairness.

Fairness is the new spirit and supported foundation to win the hearts and minds of the Southeast Asian people. Fair treatment, as against “double standards”, is social capital for the US to utilize in its role in the region.

A superior approach, as expressed through “acting like a colonial master” to dictate its will on others will be no longer be helpful and sounds obsolete.

The US needs a smart, new foreign policy formula. It has to build smart public diplomacy to help accelerate public support in the region.

The US should be highly sensitive to the development of a wider East Asian community, and its policy should not only deal with governments but the people in the region.

People-centered, people-driven and people-oriented ASEAN sends an important message to the world that people in the region have freedom and rights to respond and interpret what is understood as fair and unfair as appropriate to them.

Yes. Myanmar still has a lot of homework to do, but if we want to make things fair enough, the US government should also change its sanction policy.

Lift the sanctions on Myanmar without delay. Retaining this policy will not only undermine the US credibility among ASEAN members, but people in the region as well.

The writer graduated from the University of Indonesia and Monash University, Australia.

Follow our twitter @jakpost
& our public blog @blogIMO
| | | | | | | | Post Comments | Comments (2)

fairdinkum | Sun, 04/12/2011 - 09:12am

US has proved time and time again that it will not hesitate to break any agreement when its own selfish interest is at stake.

The native American Indians were among the first to find this out. They then coined the phrase "They speak with forked tongues."

Report Abuse

MMGyi | Sat, 03/12/2011 - 14:12pm

I believe an editorial in the South China Morning Post commented on highly probably ulterior motives of the Myanmar generals in attempting to further fill their coffers if and when sanctions are lifted. When in post 1988 it was declared that open market policy was to be adopted, they were fully prepared with their exclusive so-called Economic Holdings group which has, since the very beginning,monopolized the 'economy' of the country.

Report Abuse